Charlotte Lawyers | North Carolina Law Firm - Parton & Associates, PLLC
  • Home
  • Legal Services
    • Criminal Defense >
      • Local Government Issues >
        • Citizens Review Board
        • Homeowners' Association Hearings
      • Trafficking Charges
      • Drug Possession Offenses
      • Weapons Charges
      • Driving While Impaired
      • Vehicle Seizures
      • Boating While Impaired
      • Domestic Disputes
      • Veteran Defense
      • Record Restorations
      • Police Misconduct
      • Victim Representation
    • Commercial Litigation >
      • Construction Litigation
      • Animal Law
      • Business Disputes >
        • Avoiding Litigation
    • Traffic Charges >
      • License Suspensions
    • Business Formation & Transactions
    • Referrals
    • Volunteer Services & Pro-Bono Work
  • Attorneys & Staff
    • Corey V. Parton
    • J. Burton Powell
    • Micheal L. Littlejohn
    • Jason C. Jones
    • Shirley Garrison
    • S. Sunny Phaxaysithideth
  • Featured Cases
  • Law Blogs
  • Contact
  • Contáctenos
  • In The News
  • Make a Payment
  • Military Discounts
  • Privacy Policy

Civil Voluntary Dismissals

9/7/2016

0 Comments

 
​The North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 permits a Plaintiff on his or her own account to dismiss a previously filed action at any time before resting their case.  This permits the Plaintiff to take a second bite at the apple, so to speak, and re-file the same action a second time so long as its done within one year or, as case law points out, before the end of the original statute of limitations.
 
Rule 41 uses ambiguous language as to the time allotted for the Plaintiff to re-file the case: “If an action commenced within the time prescribed therefor, or any claim therein, is dismissed without prejudice under this subsection, a new action based on the same claim may be commenced within one year after such dismissal (…)”  N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1A-1, Rule 41(a)(1).  This language makes it sound like a Plaintiff can only re-file the action within one year of the dismissal, but case law provides otherwise. 
 
In Guyton v. FM Lending Servs., the Plaintiff voluntarily dismissed an action filed against the Defendant.  This cause of action contained a three-year statute of limitations.  More than a year later, Plaintiff brought the same action once again against the Defendant.  The Trial Court dismissed the Plaintiff’s action because it was filed outside of the one year window under Rule 41.  In reversing the Trial Court’s decision, the Court of Appeals explained that Rule 41 was implemented to extend the time to file one year from the date of the voluntary dismissal; however, Rule 41 is not to be used as a tool to shorten the Plaintiff’s time to re-file.  Guyton v. FM Lending Servs., 199 N.C. App. 30 (2009).    A Plaintiff will always have a right to re-file the action within the statute of limitations.  Guyton, 199 N.C. App. 34.  The Rule 41 one-year provision is a tool to give a Plaintiff with an expired statute of limitations an additional year to re-file the claim.  Id.  In other words, a Plaintiff who voluntarily dismisses a claim can re-file that claim within the statute of limitations of that claim or one year of the voluntary dismissal.  Id.
 
Rule 41 is a wonderful tool a Plaintiff can use to his or her advantage but its not without limitations.  Under Rule 41 “a notice of dismissal operates as an adjudication upon the merits when filed by a Plaintiff who has once dismissed in any court of this or any other state or of the United States, an action based on or including the same claim.”  N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1A-1, Rule 41(a)(1).     In other words, the Plaintiff only gets one extra bite at the apple.  A Plaintiff who tries to voluntarily dismiss a claim a second time will be barred from ever bringing the same claim again, even if the original statute of limitations has not yet expired on that action.  Plaintiffs should also be careful when using a Voluntary Dismissal, since Courts are authorized to tax the costs incurred against the “voluntary dismisser”. 
 
For more information on how lawyers can use the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure to benefit their clients, contact Parton & Associates, PLLC.
 
Written by Brittny M. Kaltenbach, Associate (NC License Pending)
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    About this blog

    The law applies differently in each situation.  Nothing on this page should be construed as or be relied upon as legal advice. 

    Parton & Associates' attorneys blog about issues important to their clients, and potential clients. 

    Archives

    December 2017
    November 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    February 2017
    December 2016
    September 2016
    July 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    October 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015

    Categories

    All

10.0Corey Vaughn Parton
Click for the BBB Business Review of this Attorneys & Lawyers in Charlotte NC
 
Corey V. Parton
 
Rated by Super Lawyers 
Joseph Haliburton PowellClients’ ChoiceAward 2016
Charlotte Lawyers
Picture
Joseph Haliburton PowellReviewsout of 11 reviews
Picture
Charlotte Lawyers
Corey Vaughn PartonReviewsout of 7 reviews
Picture
Charlotte Lawyers
Picture
Charlotte Lawyers
Charlotte Lawyers
Picture
Picture
Picture
Charlotte Lawyers
Lawyers of Distinction


​CONTACT US  /  MAKE A PAYMENT  /  LAW BLOG  /  PRIVACY POLICY

parton & associates, PLLC - Charlotte LawyerS
122 N. McDowell St.reet, Charlotte, NC 28204
Phone:  704-376-4488

©2018 Parton & Associates, PLLC - All Rights Reserved.

  • Home
  • Legal Services
    • Criminal Defense >
      • Local Government Issues >
        • Citizens Review Board
        • Homeowners' Association Hearings
      • Trafficking Charges
      • Drug Possession Offenses
      • Weapons Charges
      • Driving While Impaired
      • Vehicle Seizures
      • Boating While Impaired
      • Domestic Disputes
      • Veteran Defense
      • Record Restorations
      • Police Misconduct
      • Victim Representation
    • Commercial Litigation >
      • Construction Litigation
      • Animal Law
      • Business Disputes >
        • Avoiding Litigation
    • Traffic Charges >
      • License Suspensions
    • Business Formation & Transactions
    • Referrals
    • Volunteer Services & Pro-Bono Work
  • Attorneys & Staff
    • Corey V. Parton
    • J. Burton Powell
    • Micheal L. Littlejohn
    • Jason C. Jones
    • Shirley Garrison
    • S. Sunny Phaxaysithideth
  • Featured Cases
  • Law Blogs
  • Contact
  • Contáctenos
  • In The News
  • Make a Payment
  • Military Discounts
  • Privacy Policy
✕