When MCA Lending Crosses the Line: Using Civil RICO to Protect North Carolina Businesses

Parton Law has experience in representing North Carolina business owners who took what they believed was a short-term funding solution only to find themselves in an endless cycle that threatened the survival of their business. This unfortunate story is increasingly tied to the Merchant Cash Advance (MCA) industry, which offers business loans at exorbitant interest rates that are masked as legitimate asset purchases.

Recently, a Parton Law attorney filed a civil Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization (RICO) lawsuit in federal court against numerous lenders in the MCA industry with multiple favorable outcomes for the client.  The RICO Act gives private individuals and businesses an opportunity to sue for financial losses caused by MCA lenders who issue criminally usurious loans and then seek to collect those unlawful debts.

Not every MCA transaction is unlawful or gives rise to a RICO claim. But when these transactions are structured and enforced in certain ways, they may give rise to claims far beyond typical causes of action, including civil RICO.

The MCA Industry: Substance Over Labels

MCA lenders market their products as the “purchase of future receivables,” not as loans.

That distinction matters because loans are closely regulated, and the purchase of future receivables is usually not.

But courts across the country are increasingly looking past the labels on MCA transactions and focusing on the substance of the transactions. MCA transactions are often considered loans when they include:

  • Fixed daily or weekly withdrawals;
  • No meaningful reconciliation process based on actual receivables;
  • Guaranteed repayment obligations; and
  • Personal guarantees.

What Makes an MCA Case a civil RICO Case?

Not every MCA agreement rises to the level required to assert a RICO claim. But in the right circumstances, the facts often align with its elements, which include:

  1. Existence of an Enterprise;
  2. Predicate acts that may include a pattern of racketeering activity or instances of collecting unlawful debts;
  3. Causation; and
  4. Injury.

Why Civil RICO Changes the Outcome

From a litigation standpoint, civil RICO is not just another claim—it is a force multiplier.

It allows for:

  • Treble damages (3x recovery)
  • Recovery of attorneys’ fees
  • Broader discovery into the full Enterprise
  • Significant settlement pressure

Most MCA companies are structured to defend contract disputes.

They are far less equipped to defend enterprise-level allegations of racketeering activity.

A Parton Law Perspective: Strategy Drives Leverage

At Parton Law, we approach these cases with a focus on early leverage and strategic positioning.

That means:

  • Evaluating whether the transaction is truly a receivables purchase
  • Identifying all entities involved—not just the named funder
  • Tracing communications and payment structures
  • Building claims that reflect the full scope of the conduct

In prior complex business litigation matters, our firm has successfully pursued multi-claim strategies that expanded the case beyond a single transaction—resulting in favorable outcomes for our clients, including recoveries and negotiated resolutions.

Where the facts support it, civil RICO is part of that toolkit.

What North Carolina Business Owners Should Watch For

If your business is dealing with an MCA lender, the warning signs are often clear:

  • Payments that do not adjust with your actual future receivables;
  • Access to and control over your bank accounts;
  • Pressure from multiple affiliated entities;
  • Legal filings in unfamiliar jurisdictions; and
  • Aggressive refinancing and collection tactics.

If those factors are present, the issue may not just be the contract—it may be the structure behind it.

Final Thought: From Defense to Offense

The biggest shift in MCA litigation is this:

Businesses are no longer limited to defending collection actions—they can go on the offensive.

Courts are increasingly willing to:

  • Recharacterize MCA agreements;
  • Apply usury laws;
  • And, where appropriate, impose civil RICO liability.

For the right case, that changes everything.